View Single Post
Old 03-21-2007, 09:19 AM   #133
freddyg12
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
Re: Archuleta traded to Bears for 6th round pick

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
I was a little confused over JLC's take as well.

I don't know how anybody can be disappointed in getting rid of this guy, especially if he was the leak from last season.
I'll third that. I think a lot of what he leaves out is the chemistry factor that stems from overpaying someone. Maybe the danny didn't want to pay him, but it's also a message to the team that you won't be the highest paid player in the nfl at your position if you don't perform up to it.

I realize this goes both ways & some players may feel mgmt. is going back on its word w/AA as they did w/Lavar, but teams in the salary cap era have to cut players or ask them to take a pay cut every year. I think this was a great move & could have a huge impact on the D, all for the better.

This has got me thinkin about Coles in 05. Got rid of him & the O had a much better year thereafter. This offseason is shaping up a lot like 05, few moves in free agency, dump some dead weight (AA), & get the #6 pick. Also have a young qb who started at the end of the year, though I don't want to draw any comparisons to the Ramsey situation!
freddyg12 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 0.11730 seconds with 10 queries