Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

vaoutlaws2006 · 04-02-2007, 07:19 AM

the only way i am on board with this trade is if it is as follows...our #6 pick for their #31 and lance briggs. no if ands or buts. I think adding players that an article in the post suggests is stupid. the bears want the pot sweetened...by adding marshall, macintosh, or goldston. I think although marshall isnt big enough to be your every down mlb he is still an asset to our team i think he filled in occasionally for lavar..so he can play all lb positions and macintosh..i just dont think we know what we have there and he cost to much to draft and as far as for goldston i think he was the best player we drafted last year. Well the only one who really made an impact.

04-02-2007, 07:19 AM	#25
vaoutlaws2006 Impact Rookie Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Fayettenam, NC Age: 54 Posts: 806	Re: Rethinking Briggs the only way i am on board with this trade is if it is as follows...our #6 pick for their #31 and lance briggs. no if ands or buts. I think adding players that an article in the post suggests is stupid. the bears want the pot sweetened...by adding marshall, macintosh, or goldston. I think although marshall isnt big enough to be your every down mlb he is still an asset to our team i think he filled in occasionally for lavar..so he can play all lb positions and macintosh..i just dont think we know what we have there and he cost to much to draft and as far as for goldston i think he was the best player we drafted last year. Well the only one who really made an impact. __________________ The future is obviously right now!