Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012
I'm guessing you don't have the mystical eye of running back evaluation then.
Explain why I should put more stock into 2004 when two more recent seasons argue that it was a fluke.
|
I do, becuase if it were my call Stephen Jackson would be a Skin, and SJ is a much better back then Portis.
Funny all I here is how great Portis was last season, who was better him or Betts? You know Betts the RB I have been saying is better suited for Gibbs style of offense for 3 years now, almost everyone on this site was calling him a waste and a lowsy RB before Portis went down, and now he's so valuable he's untradable.
One more for the mystical eye, Adrian Peterson will be a better back than Portis!