View Single Post
Old 04-25-2007, 04:53 PM   #18
SKINSnCANES
Pro Bowl
 
SKINSnCANES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Jersey
Age: 44
Posts: 5,455
Re: Another Landry thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by #56fanatic View Post
I have heard from everyone that said Arch was a bad fit, that Landry will be a bad fit with Taylor as well. they say they (Taylor and Landry) are the same type of player. I had a hard time believing them about Arch in the beginning of last year, kinda hard to doubt what they are saying now.

Landry and Taylor arent the same type of player, that would be awesome if they were. Landry has potential and might learn to be a better cover safety. Taylor can cover any receiver in this league. The reason taylor didnt have as good of a year last year is because he was running around trying to cover other people players that were left open. Being a safety is so much about instinct.

Arch is not a bad safety. Hes a good safety, a traditional hard hitting safety. He was leading our team in tackles when he played. Hes great in the box, stopping the run, blitzing. but we didnt have corners last year, so he had to help in coverage, and he sucks there.
__________________
"I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis
SKINSnCANES is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 0.10460 seconds with 10 queries