Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskins8588
So if longevity doesnt matter to you, do you feel that Terrel Davis should be in the Hall of Fame? Also, again if he was so much better than Montana then Young should have had an easy time pushing Montana out. And with so much better stats than Montana why doesnt Young have atleast 1 more ring?
|
Davis does not deserve the Hall...he did not put up good enough numbers. He had 3 good seasons, that was it. Not enough for me. What I am referring to in longevity is talking about the difference in stats from someone that played 17 years as opposed to someone that played 13. Vinny is the perfect example. He played 20 years, of course his stats are going overwhelm someone that played 13 years or so. But that doesn't make him better. But you can't allow someone in the hall that had only 3 good years. You need to have a decent length career.
Again, you DO NOT under ANY circumstances push out a hall of famer for someone that hasn't proven anything. (see Brett Favre last year and this year)
In 1990, Montana was 14-2 (his last full season in SF). What allowed Young in the door was an injury to Montana, then he did so well, that the 49ers allowed a hall of famer to move on to KC. That says A LOT. So why would the 49ers push out a QB that went 14-2?
By the way, sometimes I like to argue too.
