Quote:
Originally Posted by Beemnseven
So what would give you the impression that he's been "solid" ??
You already said that his playing time was reduced due to the presence of Golston and Montgomery. So if that's the case, why are we keeping an 11-year veteran when 5th and 6th round picks offer more than he's able to give us?
Oh, I forgot -- he's a great "locker room leader."  |
The reason I get that impression is because I watched all those games in 2004, 2005 and 2006 much like I'm sure you did. I don't EVER recall Wynn being a scapegoat (as many players were) in those years. We never were like, "Man oh man, Wynn really screwed the pooch that game. We should cut him!" While he hasn't been an all-star by any means, there should not be any outcry with keeping someone as solid on the team for what is essentially vet minimum.
While I do agree we need more depth along the defensive line, I think the argument that you're presenting that we should cut Wynn nor show him any votes of confidence is a bit unfounded.