Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012
Product of offense? Maybe? Possibly?
All you've done is shown that Gates has been given a lot more oppertunities in his career. This would be a stupid point to debate anyway.
I think that given identital oppertunites that Winslow would produce a bit more than Gates. I also happen to think Winslow is the better blocker which is half of a TE's game anyway.
Even if I'm wrong, I don't see how in the world you could think its absured. Why have a discussion fourm if only conventional logic can be right?
We can't discuss TEs and not look at blocking first. We just can't.
|
Evaluating a TE based primarily on blocking skills is kind of conventional isn't it? But why evaluate TEs only by conventional thinking? Maybe the position has evolved.
In the words of Doc Brown, "You're not thinking 4th dimensionally"