Quote:
Originally Posted by That Guy
and you've decide not to show any proof that you're opinion has any more merit than anyone else's. i'll respond to the rest in a bit, but why are you so convinced scientific study is clearly 100% wrong here?
|
What are you talking about? Are you saying that evolution never had a start. It had to start somewhere. I know that how the first organism formed doesn't really have anything to do with with organisms evolving, but at some point, that first organism had to form where there was no life. That is not my opinion. That would have to be a fact for evolution to be true.
Quote:
Originally Posted by That Guy
wow, i asked for something that's not vague, and i get a vague and cryptic response. which holes in the fossil record are these? and who said anything about different species. Natural selection is more about adaptation, evolution is about separating species... but in the current issues of sciam ( www.sciam.com), it talks about recovered collagen from a T-Rex being identical to that found in chickens, helping further aid the already widely accept thought that some species (not necessarily T-Rex) evolved along that path. That's just the most recent example, but there are thousands of others. |
I already debated all this crap
here. I don't feel like doing it again.
Quote:
Originally Posted by That Guy
look, a hammer is a great tool, but it's not meant to be used with screws. evolution and origin are completely separate ideas. not only are you mixing up theories, you're arguing a point that no one ever made, unless you care to show me where anyone said anything about evolution breaking the laws of physics.
It seems like you're trying to debate theories you've never bothered to read, since the big bang, string theory, etc etc don't have matter coming from out of nowhere, so i have no idea what you're even trying to argue with that.
first origin is mainly thought to have occurred through somewhat random chance by either the replicator or membrane theory, both of which are fully explained, along with possible limitations in great depth on SciAm ( Science and technology information from Scientific American -- great magazine, btw) if you care to learn more about them.
"Popular, palatable views of the world and how it came to be do not constitute science or truth. But decent science education requires that we share the truth we find -- whether or not we like it." ---Lynn Margulis, Distinguished Professor, University of Massachusetts Amherst. |
I never said evolution breaks the laws of physics. I said matter forming from no where breaks the laws of physics. You asked who created God. I said he has just always been there and that matter would have had to have always been there if God didn't exist. And if it hasn't always been there, which I guess is what your saying since you were disagreeing with me, then something had to have created it. Matter does not appear out of nothing. That breaks the laws of physics.