Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

Daseal · 10-02-2004, 06:49 PM

I agree that helmet to helmet hits can not be permissible, but didn't they have that as a rule emphasis a year or two ago? Which caused huge fines for hits that didn't look like anything more than just a huge hit?

I'm all for punishing truly dangerous hits, but I also want players to hit hard when someone comes across the middle (namely the Washington Redskins!)

10-02-2004, 06:49 PM	#25
Daseal Puppy Kicker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arlington, Virginia Age: 43 Posts: 8,341	I agree that helmet to helmet hits can not be permissible, but didn't they have that as a rule emphasis a year or two ago? Which caused huge fines for hits that didn't look like anything more than just a huge hit? I'm all for punishing truly dangerous hits, but I also want players to hit hard when someone comes across the middle (namely the Washington Redskins!)