Quote:
Originally Posted by jdlea
Oh, so it must be the running backs who fell off, not the offensive line play. When a team loses one starter it's a problem, when you lose 2, that's a pretty big deal. Wade is getting starter money? SO WHAT!!!! (when you add exclamation points, apparently that makes you right) He's not a very good tackle and Fabini used to start, that doesn't mean anything either. It's a bad idea to add depth because you anticipate guys missing entire seasons. Neither one of them is very good, you can see that by watching them play the game.
Somehow, I think that the injured offensive linemen might be keeping the offense from producing the way they could.
|
Ok, kill me. But i don't think the replacement OL hurt us that much. We couldn't have run against the Cards anway, and Gibbs would have tried anyway. Maybe we could have improved from 2.9 a carry to 3.2 yd a carry, but so what? Our running game makes a difference only when we pass imaginatively and mix it up successfully. We suck at vanilla. Somebody in charge is denying that reality. Cooley-- one reception (Holy Stupidity, Batman.)
To get ahead in a game seems to cue the wizards with the clipboards to shut down the offense so the other teams can catch us. For that reason alone, I think we'll play better offense against the Pats-- it not being likely we'll take a lead.