Quote:
Originally Posted by BleedBurgundy
I hate to make the obvious statement but it seems as though his situation is very simlar to what Vick's was.
Parallels:
Super mobile
Not a very good passer (yet)
Bad Wideouts
Great Running Game
Wins despite overall poor stats
Decent to strong defense.
With all that said, I think VY will be better than vick as a passer but I don't know by how much.
|
True. But in light of Atlanta's woes without Vick, it seems like Vick was a good player if mediocre to poor passer? Vince is overrated by many, but like Vick he's a playmaker.