Quote:
Originally Posted by WillH
That is ludicrous. Perhaps moss was a bit disappointing early this season, but he was injured, and BL was certainly a bust. But ARE had a decent year for us, and Caldwell and McCardell both proved to be consistent third and fourth receivers. And who knows? Maybe this Anthony Mix kid will be special.
|
ARE had a decent year because he was on the field. It doesn't take a special WR to play every down and put up 51-728-1. I like him as a WR3, but he is not an every down guy. Sure, he was an improvement over Lloyd, but who isn't? I doubt if McCardell is back. Caldwell may be back and would be a nice WR4. Mix does a great job on kick coverage, but I would think he'd have played more WR if he was special.
Quote:
If you ask me the problems with our passing game began with our O-line. Yes our WR dropped alot of balls early in the season, and that should not be excused, but they settled into a rhythm and started producing consistently from the mid point of the season. Furthermore, if you look at the middle stretch during which we lost most of our games, you'll notice that our QB never had time to sit in the pocket. JC constantly had to shift around and bide his time. This allowed him to take the deep shot only a few times every game, and he overthrew a few too many of those deep shots. Yes the WR's dropped a few they shouldn't have, but if you only have a legitimate chance at catching one homerun ball a game then you're SOL. This may not be a completely analogous example, but Randy Mos couldn't do shit on the Raiders. It doesn't simply take an elite WR to turn a teams passing game around, you need a good QB and good pass protection, not to mention some relief from your running game.
I think with our O-line healthy again next year, we will get better production not only from our WR's but from the Offense as a whole. Little needs to be changed in this Offense, but what is certain is that we need young talented depth in the O-line so that late in the season we have our future starters out there showing us why they were worth the draft picks.
|
I agree. The OL drives everything. I just don't think OL depth is as big a need as a starting WR, IF that starting WR is one of the top ones in the league. Depth is what is needed on the OL, not starters. With Heyer playing well at times, we probably have pretty good depth at tackle. Adding depth at guard and center is needed, but that shouldn't eat in to the cap too much, leaving money (if they have it) to spend on a WR. So, I think the OL AND WR can be addressed in the offseason.
Quote:
As for the Defense, yes they kept us in a lot of games, and finished 8th overall in the NFL, but there is a glaring problem on our Defense. We get ZERO pressure from our front four. OK that is an exaggeration, but it is certainly a weakness, one that I would contend cost us a few games this year. How many times did we let teams drive down the field late in games and score a winning TD our FG? It seems to me that what happened in those situations is that we brought only a four man rush and dropped everyone else back to prevent the big play. It did stop the big play, but we let the teams methodically drive down the field to score and win, and it is because our front four could not disrupt the QB, plain and simple.
These are our biggest concerns hands down, and as you said our secondary could potentially become a big concern as well. I will give you this, we could certainly use an elite WR. Who Couldn't?!? But there is no way it is our #1 need right now. I will grant you that it will be necessary in the next few years for this team to become a powerhouse, but as far as developing this team into a perennial playoff contender is concerned, we have much more immediate problems.
|
Okay, I'd LOVE another DE, too. Jared Allen might be available, but he already received a 4-game suspension and his next would likely be a full year, so he's a risk. Not sure who else is out there.
Bottom line for me is that I think WR is where they need to spend money. I think the other areas (OL depth and DL) can be addressed sufficiently for less money. When it comes to the starting lineup (so that assumes all are healthy and are returning in 2008), I see ARE as the player that is furthest from where I think production from that position should be. (Daniels would be up there, too.)