[sportscurmudgeon]

If you go on physical talent only, Bryant is the better player. But the game is not merely a physical one - assuming that both players have sufficient talent to be at the NFL level.

Bryant was a pain in the posterior at Pitt; he was less than a model citizen in Dallas. The fact that the Cowboys got anyting for him - not to mention an NFL caliber WR - means that the Cowboys got a good deal. Bryant was obviously toast on that team. In the Dallas loss to the Giants, I doubt they trew the ball in his direction more than once.

Morgan is not the guy who will be a gamebreaker but he will catchw hat comes his way and help you move the chains. He's a younger version of Keyshawn but without the big mouth. This move makes Terry Glenn the Cowboys' #1 deep threat...

Frankly, given what has gone down in Dallas for the last year or so, I think the Cowboys got a good deal here. The Browns might get a good deal if Butch Davis can find a way to keep Bryant from self-immolation. But that remains to be seen.