Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack
Yeah, except I guess I don't think democracy means challenging and questioning for the sake of challenging and questioning. Which to me seems to largely be the case when it comes to many of the conspiracy theories tied to 9/11. It's like someone poses a question, an answer is given, and then that answer is never "good enough." And I just wonder what is "good enough?"
|
Are you 100% satisfied with the answers we've been given regarding 9/11?
Does the book on 9/11 deserve to be closed and never questioned?
If you think so more power to you. Personally I think there's more layers to peel back there.