Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeRedskin
For those saying 1st round WR's are risky or take too long to develop (of whom I have been one - on both counts), a reminder of something I just recalled:
"With the 18th Selection in the 1980 Draft, the Redskins select Art Monk."
While risky, if the pick is good, it can be a real payoff - most of the truly top flight WR's have been chosen in the first round ( NFL Draft History: Full Draft - by Position).
True some top tier WR's are chosen in later rounds (S. Smith, C. Johnson, T.J. Who'syour mama, T. Owens, A. Boldin). A significant number (I would suggest, substantial majority) of true top flight WR's are 1st Round choices (R. Moss, M. Harrison, R. Wayne, Braylon Edwards, L. Fitzgerald, P. Burress, I could go on...).
As with most things in the draft, WR is a crap shoot. In the year of Monk's induction, I am officially switching to the "pick a WR in round one" band wagon in hopes that the good karma train is rolling our way.
As for Hackett, more power to him. I vote "good call" by the FO. |
I wonder if this is because so many picks have been used on WRs in the first round more than anything. I definitely would say though that the fact that most good WR were first rounders is irrelevant to the point that a high percentage of first round WRs have been busts. Of course that can be said about just about any position.
One thing to note though is that in general even the really good or great WRs weren't great right away. Even guys like CJ, Burress, and TO spent a couple yaers just being OK. They all took off after a couple years.
I'd much rather we sign FAs at the WR spot where we knw what we are getting and pick linemen that are generally safer picks.