[Rajmahal33]

Originally Posted by That Guy

same thing as before.

DE/CB (depending on whos there), DT (laws), S (zbikowski), DE/CB (whichever we missed), OT (zuttah), DE (hardie), WR/ST (monk), K (coutu), LB (??? depth)

in the first it'd be DRC, harvey, merling, mcklevin, etc... hopefully one hit there.

in the third you got guys like dingle and ellis at DE and guys like godfrey at CB (draftscout lists king in the 3rd too, which i agree with and consider a value, some boards have him in the 1st though, which makes no sense).

So i guess ur philosophy is to draft for need at a certain spot rather than talent available at that spot. I'm not criticizing cuz it can be an equally good strategy (esp in a draft with good deep talent like this one with no particular dazzlers). Im just wondering why wait so late for a WR. Why not try one early and one late for insurance (especially if we need someone on special teams). Also why no interior offensive linemen. That would seem to be a position of some need for us. With that #2 pick i wouldn't be opposed to going for one there, and pushing our need for a run stopping DT to a later round. Do u agree?