Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Daseal
Cpayne if they enjoy the 8 years they had under clinton, I'll enjoy 8 years of no attacks on our soil and a strong foreign policy. I'm fine with that.
|
In fairness, we were attacked at the WTC under Clinton too. It just wasn't as catostrpohic. We will be attacked under any president regardless of party. The whole notion that we will "be safer" under either candidate is flawed.
"clinton was handed osama bin laden and said no thanks, so they let him go... hmm, no thanks"
So was Bush and he didn't finish the job of getting Osama and then focused on Iraq, who had nothing to do with 9/11. He was told from day 1 of his presidency, Osama was a threat, but Bush was too worried about his golf game and his ranch in Crawford. Now we get to watch Osama's latest video on TRL. But we do have Saddam and don't you all feel so much safer now? I was lying awake at night worried about a dictator who controlled only 1/3 of his own counrty, since we ONLY had the other 2/3 under the "no fly zones".