Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

pstylee · 04-10-2008, 01:49 PM

in regards to offiss said, we have a more productive, and better route runner who is able to play a complete season in cooley. Just look at the stats, they speak for themselves.

Shockey is overrated at best, he is just another one of the Winslow mold, who think that they are greater than they really are. Take a look at the best, Witten, Gonzalez, Gates, Cooley, and D. Clarke, those guys are not flashy but winners, and are clutch in situations. Shockey is at best a back up tight end right now. He is too much like T. O. all talk and can never make the big catch when his team needs it the most.

So for everyone that is jumping on the Shockey bandwagon, just compare the stats and the personalities of the fore-mentioned. Then realize we have a TE that is "one of the best".

04-10-2008, 01:49 PM	#25
pstylee Camp Scrub Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Oak harbor, WA Posts: 12	Re: Saints After Shockey?! in regards to offiss said, we have a more productive, and better route runner who is able to play a complete season in cooley. Just look at the stats, they speak for themselves. Shockey is overrated at best, he is just another one of the Winslow mold, who think that they are greater than they really are. Take a look at the best, Witten, Gonzalez, Gates, Cooley, and D. Clarke, those guys are not flashy but winners, and are clutch in situations. Shockey is at best a back up tight end right now. He is too much like T. O. all talk and can never make the big catch when his team needs it the most. So for everyone that is jumping on the Shockey bandwagon, just compare the stats and the personalities of the fore-mentioned. Then realize we have a TE that is "one of the best".