Quote:
Originally Posted by Drift Reality
F, because we saw a draft that was based off a front-office strategy that is fundamentally flawed.
F, because the Redskins vision is dictated by someone who has no experience in the sport.
F, because we drafted a bunch of Christmas ornaments while neglecting the tree.
F, because teams like the Patriots and Giants show us that it starts in the trenches and we seem to want to ignore what successful franchises do.
F, because we are going to see a team that resembles the Spurrier team (after Marvin Lewis left).
F, because we have the worst management in all of the NFL.
|
What is the fundamental flaw with the FO, that we needed to upgrade our WR corps? That the WCO works well with two TE/FB types to create mismatches?
The vision is being dicatated by Cerrato & Zorn. Cerrato has an NCAA championship and a SB under his belt. Zorn was a starting NFL QB for several years....no experience.
We beat the Giants once last year and should've beat them twice.
Most of the analysts graded the Skins well on this draft.....I guess that indicates we have the "worst mgmt in the NFL" :frusty:
I would've liked to see the DL addressed earlier, but there's no argument we got value with all our early picks and they all fill needs. Blache was a DL coach for years, if he wasn't screaming for a DL then he must be comfortable at least for 2008. I believe the Guard we drafted in the 3rd can also play Tackle and our immediate need was at LG. Buges is a great line coach, we survived last year's injuries, we'll survive in 2008. With JC developing and big targets to hit we'll be fine and address the OL/DE age issue with June 1 cuts or in next year's draft.