Quote:
Originally Posted by smoot27
Amen.
Thats the thing i'm trying to say also, Zorn likes JC but also likes Brennan 2 X's better. However Zorn does wan't to find JC to stay here and Favre make JC that ultamate weapon. If not JC than Favre and Zorn can work on Brennan for sure.
I don't want to sound like an peice of crap but JC is 26 now and Brannan could probably out play JC and Brannan is 24 years younger.
Back to my point have JC benched for one year and maybe actully have an pro-bowl year cause again Zorn said he is gonna run the ball"Alot" which means the passing is still not close to being great. While we get Favre it could speed things up and teach JC alot i mean alot say this would ruin JC progress but how? JC would be 27 while Romo was on bench for 2 years and ended up an pro-bowler.
I say Yes to Favre for one year, i mean to be honest our O sounds bad (besides Portis) every time an interview with Zorn he always saids" the D stop the skins all the time in the goal line and int alot of passes. I mean is our O gonna be good? or is the D just ruthless.
|
Man, your all over the place in this thread and I'm not sure where your getting all this information. The only thing I have heard Zorn say about the running game is that they would keep allot of our current plays and also keep the terms the same (I believe its a number system for the call on running scheme to be used which will not change). I also don't thank that he has commented on our performance last year like you stated on goal line play because that would be seen as attacking Gibbs as a coach. He might have said something like "we are working on some different looks on the goal line" but not pin pointing it out as you stat.