Quote:
Originally Posted by hesscl34
I am one that will totally back him if he consistently does well. The use of the word hater and idiots around here is a bit over done. People want to see him play that well over and over again, and I don't blame them. If you are realistic you know that JC played many more games poorly then he has played like he did on Sunday, so of course you are going to have doubters. Just ask Riggo and the boys on 980.
I loved what I saw on Sunday and not because the O line and wideouts did their job. I saw confidence and I saw poise and I saw JC change what he's done before that wasn’t working. THAT is growth, and I'm all for it.
|
Well what other word should be used besides hater when JC does good and people still want him to fail for some reason???? Exactly!
he is going to have good games and bad games. Who has perfect games every Sunday. Evening Peyton Manning has poor games. The O-line and wide outs do make a difference and if you have a o-line is protecting you you can gain more confidence because you have a chance to make throws.
As far as the Vick comparisions. There are other Qbs that have missed long passes and have had receivers drop balls. So the comparison is not a good one. Vick made his living running the ball. JC doesn't. Vick was a running QB. JC is more of a pocket passer by far. Be happy we won and stop trying to find things to criticize. Are you more about JC failing or us winning. Ponder that for a minute.
JC is not Ryan Leaf!! You have to give a QB a chance to grow. He will make mistakes but it only makes him better. I have seen far more horrible QBs. People have to be patient. He hasn't even had two full seasons yet. Eli Manning was given time to develop look at him now.
Imagine if we had Rex Grossman, Jon Kitna or someone like that. Then you would have vailidity to your arguement.