Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sportscurmudgeon
gortiz:
When Arizona has both Larry Fitzgerald and Anquan Boldin on the active roster, their WR corps is much better than the Skins. Boldin is better than ANYONE on the Skins' roster and Fitzgerald is certainly as good as Coles and maybe better.
Would anyone trade the Skins' WRs even-up for the ones on the Colts? If the Skins are so talented, someone might actually think that they'd rather keep the Skins' contingent. That would be a BAD move. Same with the Rams, and the Vikings and the Eagles and the Seahawks and the Patriots and the Chiefs - - and maybe even a few others.
|
The Seahawks? Talk about dropped balls, Robinson and Jackson drop more than any other duo in the league.
The Chiefs, you've got to be freaking kidding me. Watch out Pro-Bowlers, Johnnie Morton might join your ranks one day.
The Eagles have a horrible WR corps - Pinkston and Mitchell were complete busts until TO came to Philly.
The Vikings and Rams do have better wideouts than the 'Skins, but then again who can match up against Moss, or Holt & Bruce?
The Patriots don't necessarily have better wideouts, they've got one of the best QBs in the league who could make our grandparents look good.
I don't think I heard a single person say before the season that we needed to upgrade our WR corps, everyone was saying how deep and awesome that unit is.