[sportscurmudgeon]

hooskins:

In 2007 and 08, Tarvaris Jackson is a better QB than Mark Brunell. And he will be better than Brunell in 2009 too. Brunell went over the waterfall somewhere around the middle of 2006.


maroonandblack30:

JaMarcus Russel starts most of the time for the Raiders. Tarvaris Jackson is as good as Russell and maybe better.


Shaun Hill started most of the later games this year for the 49ers. Is he that much better than Jackson? I think they are equally mediocre/suub-par.


If you call Alex Smith or JT O'Sullivan the starting QB for the 49ers, then Jackson is better than both of them.


Brodie Croyle was the starter in KC until he was hurt. Jackson is not worse than Croyle - - he's not much better either.


Tyler Thigpen took over for Croyle. Jackson is probably a bit worse than Thigpen but not a lot.


None of the Browns' QBs - as in not a single one of the four who started games thie year - showed in 2008 that they were any better than Tarvaris Jackson except for the fact that two of them (Anderson and Quinn) both make tons more money than Jackson does.


Remember, I said that Jackson was not a good NFL QB and may never turn into one. But he isn't the worst QB in the NFL and he isn't the worst starting QB in the NFL.