Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SKINSnCANES
Ill be watching a Skins game, we'll get the ball first and goal. I KNOW we are going to lineup with no receviers on first and second down and hand the ball off twice.
|
1. The way our O-line has played this year, Joe
has to put in the "BIG" package to have half a chance of moving the ball inside the 10. No big secret there. It's also statistically proven that the passing game becomes more difficult inside the 20 because there is less space to operate, so Joe is going to go with what has the best chance of success. It seems so many people love to bash Gibbs play calling whether we abandon the running game or rely on it too heavily. I wish we'd make up our minds!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SKINSnCANES
We dotn try anythign fancy, we dont even have a wideout to have some sort of an option out there. Then after two failed attemps I know we are going to try and throw it to a TE, but we still might only have one receiver out.
|
2. It's no big secret that Gardner has been one of our most inconsistent receivers the whole year and Coles has been hampered since his injury. Cooley probably is our best pair of hands on the offense so why not throw it to him?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SKINSnCANES
The problem with our passing game is that we never gave brunell more than two options to throw at. If both of them were covered whats he supposed to do. They usually dont even let portis pop out and dump it off for a screen pass to keep the D honest.
|
3. Failing to mention here that options or not Brunell didn't have the combination of arm strength and accuracy to complete a pass
period. We could have run a Spurrier style offense with a half dozen passing options and he still couldn't have completed more than half his attempts.