[DIRTEE]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

So you want the team to let go the guy that actually catches INTs and has something to prove to the league; and keep the CB that has stones for hands, got sulky towards the end of the season, and lost his starting job? And you are comparing this to the deal for the player (JT) who did not produced b/c his leg almost fell off because of injury, since we all knew that was going to happen, right? Just checking the facts.

Personally I think the best deal would be to keep both Rogers and Hall. Rogers is a damn good corner, and along with Hall it would give us one of the best CB tandems in the league. I don't know why we HAVE to chose one or the other. They are both young, they are talented, and they compliment each other (Rogers is a very good defender and Hall is a ballhawk) Honestly they only reason Rogers should is if...a.) he wants to leave or b.) we get a ridiculous deal.

Finally, front office haters, the last time the FO made a bad deal was when we traded away picks for TJ Duckett (which no one mentions). Jason Taylor wasn't a terrible deal, it was just bad luck. And last year's offseason, was an improvement from the days of the Lloyd/Archuleta-type acquisitions. So unless the FO makes D. Hall the highest paid CB, just quit it with tiring negative remarks, ok? Thanks.

I concur.