Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

GTripp0012 · 03-16-2009, 01:49 AM

Moss has already peaked as well. He actually is a pretty good Holt comparable. He's likely to fall off the point at which we can consider him a starting caliber receiver within a year or two. For 2009 though, Moss figures to be a borderline No. 1, probably more of a No. 2. But like Holt, Moss' last season with strong peripherals was 2006, and he's been significantly less effective the last two seasons.

Holt, at this point, is no longer go-to-receiver material. Basically, you can put him with all the other interchangeable "system" guys (like Randle El). So does Holt fit in our system? Probably not, considering he's never played in anything like the WCO in his career, but I could be wrong here.

The faster Kelly can develop and take the No. 1 target mantle from Moss, the better. If he doesn't by 2010, we're kinda screwed.

03-16-2009, 01:49 AM	#67
GTripp0012 Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Evanston, IL Age: 38 Posts: 15,994	Re: Holt released by Rams Moss has already peaked as well. He actually is a pretty good Holt comparable. He's likely to fall off the point at which we can consider him a starting caliber receiver within a year or two. For 2009 though, Moss figures to be a borderline No. 1, probably more of a No. 2. But like Holt, Moss' last season with strong peripherals was 2006, and he's been significantly less effective the last two seasons. Holt, at this point, is no longer go-to-receiver material. Basically, you can put him with all the other interchangeable "system" guys (like Randle El). So does Holt fit in our system? Probably not, considering he's never played in anything like the WCO in his career, but I could be wrong here. The faster Kelly can develop and take the No. 1 target mantle from Moss, the better. If he doesn't by 2010, we're kinda screwed. __________________ according to a source with knowledge of the situation. Last edited by GTripp0012; 03-16-2009 at 01:55 AM.