[Paintrain]

Originally Posted by celts32

I would think the argument for this would be that JC has been mostly a game manager. Game managers are usually not responsible for winning or losing the game. I think JC detractors would like to see him take more chances with the ball and make more plays and score more points even if on the flip side that comes with more mistakes and an occasional lost game that he is responsible for.

I am on the fence on JC...I am mostly a supporter of his...but at the same time he does need to make more plays next season.

I think even the most ardent Campbell supporters would agree with you that he's been more of a game manager than a playmaker in our offense. I'm with you about being JC more of a risk/reward player. I think that comes with time and getting away from the Gibbs fraidy-cat offense he was 'raised' in.

But some (BHA and others) speak as if he's a disaster behind the center and is solely causing us to not win games. That's the logic I don't get.