04-09-2009, 08:52 PM
|
#20
|
|
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 10,069
|
Re: Nuclear Weapons
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beemnseven
Wrong. The Japanese were willing to surrender as early as May, 1945 with the only stipulation being that they wanted to keep their Emporer. This didn't fit Truman's definition of "unconditional surrender". They dropped the bombs, and still wound up allowing Japan to keep its Emporer.
So in effect, Truman actually accepted the Japanese terms of surrender, but dropped the bombs anyway. You can read any number of sources from Chairman of the Joint Chief of Staff Admiral William Leahy, to Fleet Admiral Chester Nimitz, to U.S. Fleet and Naval Operations chairman Ernest J. King, to Eisenhower who all agreed that the Japanese had already been defeated, and it was completely unnecessary to use the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Make no mistake - the decision to use the bomb was political, and not based out of concern for the military.
|
Bravo sir, nicely-well-done.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder."
-Jenkins
|
|
|