Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

Dirtbag59 · 07-01-2009, 02:28 PM

I think Colt should be in the 60's to be honest and that takes into account the new ratings curve, or lack there of. Fletcher at an 89 is a sin.

Other thoughts:

- Dockery should be higher then Jansen. In fact Dockery should be an 83
- Randy Thomas maybe should be a little lower but I wouldn't be surprised if he had a great year this year thanks to his offseason surgery
- Blades should be in the 60's
- Golston should be in the low 70's and and Carter should be a little lower then his 84 rating
- Horton at 70 also counts as a sin. He should at least be a 75 though 80 is more likely what he should be rated.

07-01-2009, 02:28 PM	#10
Dirtbag59 Naega jeil jal naga Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland Age: 40 Posts: 14,750	Re: Redskins Madden 2010 Player Ratings I think Colt should be in the 60's to be honest and that takes into account the new ratings curve, or lack there of. Fletcher at an 89 is a sin. Other thoughts: - Dockery should be higher then Jansen. In fact Dockery should be an 83 - Randy Thomas maybe should be a little lower but I wouldn't be surprised if he had a great year this year thanks to his offseason surgery - Blades should be in the 60's - Golston should be in the low 70's and and Carter should be a little lower then his 84 rating - Horton at 70 also counts as a sin. He should at least be a 75 though 80 is more likely what he should be rated. __________________ "It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG