Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
So Moore being involved invalidates the article? What about Krugman and Gergen?
|
I think his point was that, if you happen to be
Rolling Stone, choosing to venture into the realm of politics is certainly a curious decision. Having Michael Moore in a roundtable just implies an agenda.
If this was
Time, he'd probably just throw a quick one-liner at it and move on to real issues. You know, sort of the way I view Thomas (Rolling Stone) v. Kelly (Time).