Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldSkins
1.) I never said that we should take a QB at #4.
2.) Just because it's a weak QB class doesn't mean that Bradford isn't worthy of a top ten pick (He would have been the #1 QB off the board last year if he didn't return to school)
3.)If Okung is gone and we can't trade back who do you select?
4.)Cerrato didn't really address the line with later picks, he always seemed to go for LB's and speacial team players in the later rounds.
|
It's not just you, it seems like a everyone is saying this, "we must pick a QB at #4, we must pick a QB at #4".
I'm sure that if Bradford is there at #4, there will be some interest for that pick by a few teams that are in desperate need of a QB.
And Cerrato didn't address the line period. We always seem to pick up old lineman as a way to patch things up.