Quote:
|
Originally Posted by wewhite3
Ok Skinforlife28, I'm sure all the teams that passed up on Moss, the year he was drafted said the same thing, I mean you trying to tell me Mark Clayton is better than Mike Williams, and who remember the other WR drafted the Year Randy Moss was, yea that's what I thought, If Minnesota takes Williams and he has a break out year, then I'll see if your side GM ability worked, and If we go 6-10, because we think were NE, were not, Skinforlife or Scamforlife, why wouldn't Minnesota take Williams they can imporve in FA.....just don't respond unless you know facts, Clayton not even a Top 3 receivers in the draft, not even
|
Well the year that Randy got drafted was a weak WR draft. Only notables to come out were Dyson, Hines Ward, and Az Hakim. So the Vikings needed a WR and they got the best one on the board, no doubt. But to compare a player to Moss is absurd. Williams might not be the 2nd comming of any great recievers and Mark Clayton truly is not a bad pick. Question really here is character, for that alone we are lucky we do not have Randy Moss. Clayton is a top 3 WR. It goes Williams then Edwards or visa versa then Clayton. Who else is ahead of these 3 at WR, in anybodies profiles. Please let us see where you have found these facts. KNOW YOUR FACTS DUDE!!! And don't call people names as that is truly Moss-like.