Quote:
Originally Posted by BigHairedAristocrat
This disgusts me.
Steelers QB Ben Roethlisberger should settle with his new accuser - Mike Florio - NFL - Sporting News
If Rothlesberger is innocent, then yeah, i can see how Florio's advice would make sense. But what if he's guilty? Florio is basically saying, "if you have a lot of money, its ok to commit rape. you can just pay off the victim later if they decide to talk."
I realize that none of us know the facts, but it distrubs me that so many people are assuming that he's innocent of rape and that she is guilty of purgery. We don't know a thing about this woman, but we know enough about Rothlesberger to question both his character and his judgement. If people are going to start making assumptions, i dont see why they would side in favor of Rothlesgerger.
|
while i agree with you, i dont think we should use the AZ allegations (which seem to be false) to bolster this accusation.
just b/c you were drunk doesnt mean you committed rape.
just b/c you were accused of rape before, doesnt mean you raped now.
the AZ allegation will not be admissible evidence if this one goes to trial.
so what do we really have to question roth's credibility vs the woman's? the motorcycle accident? the fact that he seems to like to drink?
without actual facts coming to light, i cant make a judgment call.