Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule
Ya know, I haven't got a clue. I would say, if they have enough to file a charge, then they would probably have enough to get the warrant. Other than that I don't know. Seems like if he admits to consensual happenings and isn't denying the act but only the consent, then why would DNA even matter?
And for the record, I am just going off of what's on the news, and basic knowledge, I'm not a lawyer or have any such experience to give substantial backing to my thoughts.
|
credskins, your on point. they would need a warrant to take a DNA sample from ben unless he consents. of course, logic dictates that if they want a sample from ben they must have some dna fluid on the alleged victim to compare it to.
im guessin he was gettin head, (something happens), she hits her head.