Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012
Ehhhhhh.
I don't know if I'd go that far. I just don't think there's a guy in that bunch I'd support taking in the top five.
If there was one, it'd be Stafford most likely, but dude has some serious accuracy issues with the football that might prevent him from being anything more than passable.
I had a second round grade on Stafford compared to mid-to-late firsts on both Clausen and Bradford, and a fourth on Sanchez. But if there was one guy I would knowingly overdraft based on intangibles, it'd be Stafford (Detroit might have done just this).
|
Gtripp - im confused on how you evaluate qbs. im starting to think you undervalue the position way too much.
you gave stafford a 2nd round grade - he was drafted 1st overall
sanchez a 4th round grade - he was drafted 5th overall
bradford and claussen a mid-late 1st round grade - bradford is projected to be 1st overall, claussen in the top 10.
in another thread you said its stupid to pick a QB at value. so if you need a qb, theres a qb with a top 5 grade and your picking 4th, you dont pick the qb? b/c that would be picking him at his value?
i get wanting to draft a qb with a pick later than his value but good luck finding that buggy with a porsche engine under the hood. i think every team would love to draft guys later than what they have them graded as is, but while players might slip here or there, its just not realistic.
idk man, just odd how to treat these rookie qbs compared to your assessments of JC.