Quote:
Originally Posted by Trample the Elderly
That house on fire analogy is a talking point that they use for people who watch television and subscribe to FED brainwashing like good little Germans. When I see a politician move his lips, I know he's lying.
If my house burns to the ground so be it. What your asking everyone else to do is to buy me a new one. That's what insurance is for. If I don't have it, oh effing well.
If criminals break into my house, Oh God I wish they would, it will be the last house they break into. Ignore everything else I say, believe that. I've dogs, an AK, and my neighbors do too. Nothing would get my rocks off further than pumping round after round into some low life scum. The police, please . . . Richmond used to be #1 in murder. Do you think I'd entrust my life to a bunch of keystone cops? Cops are social janitors. They draw chalk lines around your body when you're dead. Sometimes they find the person who did it. Sometimes not.
I wouldn't use Al Qaida as an example. That's the biggest criminally negligent eff up in US history.
That's a good point. The dumb asses that allowed 9/11 to happen are the same ones that want to take over your health insurance. Stellar idea y'all.
|
You twisted my examples. I think we both know that if your house were actively burning (not already burned completely) but too much for you to handle alone, you'd call the fire department. Otherwise you'd be a complete idiot, which you are not.
My example of thugs (that's plural) was intended to convey the idea that you are outnumbered and cannot defend your loved ones by yourself, regardless of your firearms. In this case you would call the police, because otherwise you'd be a complete idiot, which you are not.
So, back to brass tacks: I already pay so that you can call for that help. If I then refuse to pay so that you can live a normal healthy life, I'm drawing a very arbitrary line.