Quote:
Originally Posted by Slingin Sammy 33
I don't want to interrupt the back and forth with you and fd, but just wanted to share a couple of things to think about.
1) There are already state programs in place to provide health insurance for children (SCHIP). No new gov't program is needed here.
2) Why should fd or anyone who owns a small business have to cut into their business profits to provide health insurance for someone? If fd choses to offer health coverage it makes it more attractive to employees to work at his company, if he choses not to, that's his choice. He should not be mandated by the government to provide health insurance coverage.
My wife and I own a small restaurant (as a side business, I have a full-time job). Due to the economic downturn, we are working several more hours per week to keep "above water". Can I go to the federal government and have a mandate that my employees have to work for less money per hour so I can cover all the expenses? Will my employees cover the rent for April? Of course not. Keep in mind the financial risk small business owners take before you suggest they just "cut profits".
|
By not providing healthcare to his employees FD is silently passing on the cost of covering his employees to the tax payers.