Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

Mechanix544 · 03-30-2010, 08:52 PM

I wouldnt say that "we're good" at WR...... CB yes, but not WR. a short #1 option and two underachieving 3rd year players are not the definition of strength at said position. We need a real #1 Somehow, but I think that will have to wait until next year.....

03-30-2010, 08:52 PM	#17
Mechanix544 The Starter Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Fort Bliss, TX Posts: 2,277	Re: Redskin Mock Draft I Conducted Online I wouldnt say that "we're good" at WR...... CB yes, but not WR. a short #1 option and two underachieving 3rd year players are not the definition of strength at said position. We need a real #1 Somehow, but I think that will have to wait until next year.....