Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

SBXVII · 04-26-2010, 01:51 PM

I gave a grade of "C". I easily could have given a "B" though. I question the WR with a weight of 175 when we need a possession receiver.

I questioned the TE pick. Thought about it and understood they were utilizing him at FB. But I always thought FB's were bigger then TE's? cause they are mostly used for blocking for the RB or at the goal line.

04-26-2010, 01:51 PM	#82
SBXVII Franchise Player Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Virginia Posts: 7,766	Re: Redskins 2010 Draft Class with Analysis I gave a grade of "C". I easily could have given a "B" though. I question the WR with a weight of 175 when we need a possession receiver. I questioned the TE pick. Thought about it and understood they were utilizing him at FB. But I always thought FB's were bigger then TE's? cause they are mostly used for blocking for the RB or at the goal line.