Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

vallin21 · 05-01-2010, 07:21 AM

A B- is about right, considering they got Mcnabb, Williams, Carriker, and a steal in Capers. I still think Perry Riley was a reach, and would've been available in the 6th (he was kinda shocked he got drafted that high). I thought a FS or RT were more pressing needs considering Rocky wasn't traded and that we have no true starter at both RT and FS, but I think Austin is a poor man's D-Jackson, and Morris might be on the field WK 1, so Shanahan/ Allen made up for it in the late rounds, but Riley IMO was not even the best avilable LB on the board.

05-01-2010, 07:21 AM	#28
vallin21 The Starter Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 1,198	Re: Redskins 2010 Draft Class with Analysis A B- is about right, considering they got Mcnabb, Williams, Carriker, and a steal in Capers. I still think Perry Riley was a reach, and would've been available in the 6th (he was kinda shocked he got drafted that high). I thought a FS or RT were more pressing needs considering Rocky wasn't traded and that we have no true starter at both RT and FS, but I think Austin is a poor man's D-Jackson, and Morris might be on the field WK 1, so Shanahan/ Allen made up for it in the late rounds, but Riley IMO was not even the best avilable LB on the board.