View Single Post
Old 06-17-2010, 11:33 PM   #5
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 12,514
Re: Guard watches coast for oil slick's first wave

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trample the Elderly View Post
I was thinking . . .

Many states including mine wanted to open up off-shore drilling and had their state senators petition the government to remove the moratorium on off-shore drilling. The President agreed to lift the ban, if I recall right?

Enron and BP are architects of the cap-and-trade legislation / ponzi scheme for taxing and regulating one of the most common elements on our planet, carbon dioxide. The is for you Joe Theisman Fan, PLANTS BREATHE carbon dioxide and we exhale it. So these assholes are creating one of the best rackets ever (next to religion), taxing the air. And you liberal schmucks will go along with it because you feel guilty for destroying the Earth. The rest are just ignorant and are being played like cheap tricks, by fear / war mongering politicians who get their marching orders from their Gang Bankster overlords. Enron got taken down for cooking their books, but BP is still alive and kicking.

Oh, this is the same BP that had the CIA overthrow Mohammad Mosaddegh because he nationalized the Persian oil fields that were controlled by . . . British Petroleum. But you think the Persians hate us because Washington supports Israel and they hate freedom and the American way of life.

Barry Soetoero, or whatever the eff he's calling himself these days, gets on the TV and tells the American sheeple that we need to get off fossil fuels, replace them with windmills and solar power, pass climate legislation, and basically tells us that he can't fix the leak any time soon. Guess he can't?!

We can fix the leak. We could have and still can burn off the oil on the surface. It's standard industry procedure.

Or perhaps this is all just a coincidence? Never let a catastrophe go to waste.
there can be excess carbon dioxide and water vapor as well, I believe nasa's climatology dept said the vapor was an even bigger risk, idk I'd have to look at it again.. it was a few years ago that I read about it.. they do some of the readings right here in MD
tryfuhl is offline  

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 0.15302 seconds with 10 queries