Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

jdlea · 03-10-2005, 03:29 PM

Everybody on this site that tries to rip Smoot for leaving...listen to me! The reason he left is because of the structure of the deal, like Daseal said. Now, if he had signed the deal the Redskins were going to give him one of two things would have happened.

1. He wouldn't have seen the end of it because he would have been cut. Which would have been the reason I rejected the Skins offer

2. He wouldn't have seen the end of it because he would have told to restructure or he would have been cut.

Staying with the Skins is lose-lose most times for the player. They promise big money and they never deliver. Much like every other team, I know and I figured I'd get it out of the way before ALL of you reply by saying that. However, the worst 2 teams at it, in my opinion, are us and the Broncos.

03-10-2005, 03:29 PM	#10
jdlea Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arlington, VA Age: 41 Posts: 3,109	Re: Smoot wants Vikings to trade for Gardner Everybody on this site that tries to rip Smoot for leaving...listen to me! The reason he left is because of the structure of the deal, like Daseal said. Now, if he had signed the deal the Redskins were going to give him one of two things would have happened. 1. He wouldn't have seen the end of it because he would have been cut. Which would have been the reason I rejected the Skins offer 2. He wouldn't have seen the end of it because he would have told to restructure or he would have been cut. Staying with the Skins is lose-lose most times for the player. They promise big money and they never deliver. Much like every other team, I know and I figured I'd get it out of the way before ALL of you reply by saying that. However, the worst 2 teams at it, in my opinion, are us and the Broncos.