Quote:
Originally Posted by 44 70 chip
I think it's pretty obvious inference considering the material that was released, that's she seems to be a football groupy, and poses for mens T&A and soft core porn mags. (so obviously she has tight morals and doesn't want mens attention LOL)
But hey maybe I'm wrong, it's totally possible that she never flirted with the guy, played around, or said anything to lead him on. She's just a sideline reporter <que picture of her posing on sidelines with cut down jets half T-shirt and hip high jeans>
I'm sure it's totally normal for guys to send pics of their junk to women who ignore them and are completely disinterested... Us cave men males... we're always out raping and pillaging and texting pics of our dongs to innocent women.
So yeah whatever I'm sure the pics of male genatalia set her back 10 years on her path to nun-hood.
We're not talking about her boss or any criminal or legal claim of Sexual harassment.... We're talking about a jock goofing with a women who's major qualification for her job appears to be football groupy status, her body and appearances in playboy and maxim magazine as her resume.
What we're REALLY talking about is humorless tut tuting, Neo-prude PC say-the-politically-correct-thing-at-all-costs. Even at the cost of self respect, common sense, the truth or honesty.
|
Jesus Christ.
This isn't "a jock goofing off". This is a professional, paid athlete sending cock pictures and dirty messages to professional, independent contractors, a situation known in any work-related, professional setting as SEXUAL HARASSMENT for which YOU or I could fired.
Period. End of story.
NOBODY should have to put up with this type of "goofing off" on the job. How she dresses
at work is immaterial! What she sees in the locker room
at work is immaterial!
Neither is an invitation for you or Brett to send her pictures of your cocks or unwanted sexually-laced messages. This is basic professionalism-on-the-job stuff here. It's called How to Refrain from a Hostile Work Environment 101, stuff that any "cave man male" or otherwise intellectually-challenged twit would avoid if they want to keep their job and not be sued.
And bottom line, since you don't know this woman, you can't speak for her.
Try using "politically correct" in its proper context or don't use it all; it has no place here since you are obviously twisting its meaning out of all sense of definition or proportion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 44 70 chip
So apparently in her universe "dong shots" were a commonplace occurrence... Seems a little far fetched to surmise that she had nothing at all to do with any of that. How many women do you know that receive multiple "dong shots" from different men, out of sheer coincidence? But we'll only ever know her side of the story.
|
The pictures and texts speak for themselves. She doesn't have to offer justification to you or anyone else about the evidence at hand. They are
prima facie inappropriate, unprofessional, and conducive to a hostile work environment that NO ONE should be forced to work in. Any Joe Blow on this board doing this stuff at work tomorrow would be fired on the spot, and any Joe Blow on this board defending it ("He was just goofing off, boss, gee whiz, don't be so PC!") the other Joe Blow doing it would be laughed and shamed out of the office.
Again, that's How to Refrain from a Hostile Work Environment 101 stuff that any dolt should know.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 44 70 chip
That I admit was a hazy recollection of some big study decades ago, and it might have been more about "men who have seriously contemplated cheating" than actual cheating.
I know there are polls that suggest less than half, but then you can find guys who think a BJ isn't cheating so I'm not sure how much stock to put in a poll that asks men if they have cheated before. Which also assume they are answering truthfully.
|
Ah, I see, it was a nonsense number you pulled out of thin air and mixed it with vague anecdotal and personal vapidity and such.
Cool.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 44 70 chip
Why do you need to stoop to insults? Don't have much else to bring to the discussion? Do you normally get that defensive when someone holds an opinion that you don't agree with? Why does my honesty threaten your sense of propriety so much?
|
I didn't insult you, I insulted your post, which was and is absurd. You not agreeing with me is the least of that post's problems, and I don't get defensive with people who are merely loudly wrong.
But you outdid yourself with the one to which I am responding now. So, carry on...