Quote:
Originally Posted by skinster
I think this is a silly question. Really a franchise qb is all a team needs to compete for any given game. A left tackle can not do that. Yea we wouldnt be as good for the next few years, but it would DEF pay off in the long run. We can make a respectable o-line within the next couple of years without williams, but an elite qb is something that is near impossible to come across unless you have a top pick. Make no mistake, bradford WILL be elite a few years down the road.
|
Vinny Cerratto? Is that you? I did not know you were a member of this sight.
How has the unemployed life treating you? Playing golf?..star in another movie?
Vinny, if there is one thing you should have learned from the disaster you created here in Washington is that a strong offensive line, healthy running game and balanced attack is more conducive to winning than just having a great franchise Qb, a pass happy offense and a weak O-line.
Ask John Elway, he was on some pass happy teams that got blown the FU*K up in several superbowls. Embarrassing!
Elway was the "ultimate franchise QB" and it wasn't until 1997 that a strong run blocking O-line was put together and Terrel Davis appeared before they came close to winning a SB. Terrel Davis was MVP of Denver's first SB rushiing 30 time for 157 yards. Elway had 123 yards passing.
Same can be said about the other "great Franchise QB" Peyton Manning.
In the only SB that Manning has won, Joseph Addai and D. Rhodes accounted for 190 yards rushing on an amazing un-Peyton Manning like 40 carries. Probably the last time a Peyton Manning team ran the ball 40 times in a game.
Manning had a very pedestrian like SB with one TD 247 passing yards.