Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsguy
The only complaints I have had with our secondary is the amount of cushion they allow some receivers. Of course, I'm not sure if that is the design of the defensive secondary, or if that is personal preference with the DBs. Usually, neither Rogers nor Hall gets beat deep. I think what happens when you see our secondary getting picked apart is the lack of help from our safeties. Much to often this year, our safeties have been out of position which causes blown coverages. So, I can't say I have been too upset with Rogers or Hall. Would love for Rogers to have more INTs, but I just don't believe that will ever happen. I'm just happy he has the talent to break up passes when they're thrown his way.
|
I chose to quote you over Insane cause you were hitting the whole secondary...
My questions to both of you is .... is there any possible way that, that was Haslett's game plan? Keep the game in front of them. Insane brought up a good point about Hall letting the WR run past him but if he's supposed to be in a zone and sitting there then it would be Landry's job to pick up the WR which didn't happen.
My issue is we have corners that are better at man-to-man and we are making them sit 5-10 yrds off the WR. Even if it's a zone package I feel we should be playing our CB's on the line jamming the WR to throw off the timing of the route and then fall into their zone package. Instead the CB's let the WR's get up to speed and juke them into a wrong move and their wide open.