[sportscurmudgeon]

He doesn't get credit for an INT in the Chicago game as a game-winner because Chicago was not actually in any danger of scoring at that point. Only a breakdown by the defense would have given them a score. Hmmm... That's sort fo what happened in the Dallas II game. The Cowboys were in no danger of scoring with about 60 yards to go and Vinny T under center unless there was a defensive breakdown. How'd that happen again?

The reason I said that the Redskins would not need for Taylor to make a big play late in the Dallas II game if everyone else had done something outstanding earlier on is because others here say you can't blame the loss on just one player. OK, if that's the case, then it was Ramsey's fault for not throwing TDs earleir. If that makes sense to you, go for it. It makes no sense to me.

The game was in hand for the Redskins; it was ready to go in the "W" column unless the defense blew it badly. That happened; go check out the final score and you'll be reminded of it. So, do you want to blame the DL for not getting a sack? Or the LBs for not knocking the WR on his ass at the line of scrimmage? Or the other DBs for covering their men so well that Vinny discovered Taylor's blown coverage? Who made the mistake with seconds left to play that cost the team a victory? Somebody did it or else it would have been a win and not a loss/

You don't think it was Sean Taylor. Fine. Who was it?