Quote:
Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001
Exactly, whatever position we make a choice at he will become an instant starter. Best player available is the best choice for us in the 1st round. In the 2nd round id take a player at the biggest position of need after our 1st pick (preferably an o-lineman).
If we can (WE BETTER) re-sign Moss i think we have other units that are bigger area of needs. 1. o-lineman 2. DE 3. OLB 4. DB/FS (depending on where Barnes starts next year).
|
I don't know. I think if a team has players at every position but only needs 1 or 2 players to fill positions where players left from then I'd agree BPA. If you had a team that had needs every where I'd agree with BPA.
I know some would say we are in the latter catagory, but I'm just not sure if it's the best way to go and I probably wouldn't know until the moment the Skins pick comes up. I think it's best to look into all options including any trades we could get with the 10th pick in order to pick up more picks, but that doesn't mean we need to actually trade. Just be prepared prior to the Skins pick taking place.
Again for me it's more BPA at one of the positions we have a need for. I just don't get the idea of if the Skins pick comes up and a TE is the top pick we should pick a TE because he's BPA. Same could be said for LT. The Skins just picked up a LT last yr. So for me I would rather the Skins look at their needs OL, NT, LB, FS, QB, and WR, and possibly decide which player still on the board is the BPA out of those positions and take him. However it would also depend on what the team did in FA, meaning if they went out and picked up a FA WR who is #1 quality then I think we could look at WR late in the draft or even UDFA's. Then next year pick up a WR in the first or second round. I'm just using WR as an example but you could say the same for any of the other positions also.