Quote:
Originally Posted by SirClintonPortis
I said I found Mayock's comment interesting. I said it may possibly mean one of Locker's issues may be partially fixable.
That does not mean I said "this is a reason we should take him at tenth in the first round".
That does not mean I said "so-and-so should not be taken".
That does not mean "Locker is better than every other QB out there".
I said what Mayock said was interesting. I said it may possibly mean one of Locker's issues may be partially fixable. That is all. I did not even mention what I would do. What I would do, given my gigantic ignorance in all things draft, is burn a [nonexistent] 3rd rounder on him in a hypothetical world.
|
Not nailing you CP, just the media's love affair with Locker. I figured you were just going along with the article. I found it rather amusing how all the booth guys for the Nebraska vs Wash bowl game were fawning over the kid, even though his passing game was crap. The kid blows chunks for a 4 year starter. As for Cam, I rather get Gabbert or Ponder, but Cam gets the nod over Locker anyday. When guys were talking about Locker in here last year as a possible QB for us I gagged. Guy was a INT machine.