Quote:
Originally Posted by SBXVII
Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule
I would imagine the players would say because there are 32 ownership groups, and thousands of current and retired players.
|
I maybe missing the point, but honestly, I could care less about the retired players. They chose that path. and... although the NFL nor the NFLPA has developed any type of retirement fund, I feel the players themselves had every opportunity to take a portion of their earnings and put it into an IRA or something. Instead they pissed it away. I just don't see how that should be placed on the owners and they be forced to solve the problem. How about the NFLPA step up and create a retirement fund and have the players give a % of their income to be put into a retirement fund for the future... kinda like the social security dept.
I also have felt that the insurance issue is BS also. Let the NFLPA act like any other corporation and find a decent HMO for all the players and again let the players pay for their own insurance and their families if they chose the family package. The more players that take the deal the lower the monthly costs.
Lastly, I'm not trying to sound one sided but all in all if the players are unhappy they can always take their talents to the CFL, UFL, or where ever. Fans will follow them just to see them. The owners have more invested and more to worry about in regards to this very thing happening. |
Well the NFLPA represents current players, retired players (atleast that's my understanding).
As for the NFLPA acting like a corporation, it is not, it is a Union, the NFL is the "corporation"- type entity, so your argument actually tends to back the players point
in the end I maintain both sides just need to set aside pettiness and "man up" at the negotiating table.