Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012
Are you at all concerned that the pretty good Texans offense truly exploded when Kyle left? I mean sure, it doesn't take a genius to draw up plays that will allow Matt Schaub, Owen Daniels, and Andre Johnson to put up their numbers, but Kyle left and the Texans found that they had great pieces in Arian Foster, Vonta Leach, and Joel Dressen as well, not to mention they finally found five offensive lineman who could be their starting OL 4 years from now.
I don't know how much that really says about Kyle, probably nothing, but if he's going to be given a pass based on his success with the Texans, it's worth pointing out that the Texans offense w/o Kyle was better than it was with him.
|
Come now, sir. The Houston Texans offense did not "explode" when Kyle left.
In 2009 they were number 4 in total offense. In 2010, they were number three.
In 2010, the Texans were number 4 in passing offense. In 2009 they were number one.
In 2010, they were 9th in scoring offense. In 2009 they were tenth.
In 2010, Matt Schaub passed for 4,370 yards, 24 touchdowns and 11 interceptions. In 2009, he passed for 4,770 yards (most in the league), 29 touchdowns and 15 interceptions.
The only statistical category the Texans truly improved in was rushing offense, where they ranked 30th. But even then, when Arian Foster finally worked his way into the starting line up for the last two games in 2009, he rushed for 97 yards and 119 yards.
And even a more balanced offensive attack and the league's leading rusher only bumped them from four to three in total offense.
So no, sir, I wouldn't call that an "explosion", nor is it proof that the team did better when Kyle left.